Pages

Tuesday, June 2, 2020

One Cause of Racial Inequality

Amidst the turmoil in our cities this week a number of folks in the media commentariat have opined that the violence we see is only superficially about the killing of George Floyd and more substantively a consequence of the dire inequalities that exist in this country between whites and blacks and the frustrations those inequalities entail.

Well, maybe. But why do those inequalities exist in the first place? One reason is surely the miserable education that, for whatever reason, most residents of our inner cities acquire. The following is an older post, but things evidently have not changed much since it was written.

An article at CNS News offers some dismal statistics about the state of education in America's cities. In Detroit for example,
Ninety six percent of eighth graders are not proficient in mathematics and 93 percent are not proficient in reading. Only 4 percent of Detroit public school eighth graders are proficient or better in math and only 7 percent in reading.
Why is this? Is it because not enough money is being spent on education? Evidently not:
This is despite the fact that in the 2011-2012 school year—the latest for which the Department of Education has reported the financial data—the Detroit public schools had “total expenditures” of $18,361 per student and “current expenditures” of $13,330 per student.

According to data published by the Detroit Public Schools, the school district’s operating expenses in the fiscal year that ended on June 30, 2014 amounted to approximately $14,743 per student.
The depressing statistics are only marginally better nationwide, but they're especially bad in urban districts. Less than fifty percent of eighth grade students in twenty one major cities are proficient in reading:


In reading, the Cleveland public schools were next to last among the large urban school districts with only 11 percent scoring proficient or better. Baltimore and Fresno were tied for third worst with only 13 percent scoring proficient or better; and Philadelphia ranked fifth worst with only 16 percent scoring proficient or better.

The Cleveland public schools also ranked next to last in math, with only 9 percent of eight graders scoring proficient or better. Baltimore and Fresno were also tied for third worst in math, with only 12 percent scoring proficient or better; and Los Angeles ranked fifth worst with 15 percent scoring proficient or better in math.
This education gap is doubtless the proximal cause of the income gap that distresses so many observers.

When so few young people are able to read well or do basic math those youngsters face a very bleak future. They're poorly prepared to enter a workforce that requires basic intellectual skills in order to succeed economically. It's simply commonsense that those with reading and math competency are going to command higher incomes than those whose education suits them for little more than manual labor, and that the gap between the educated and the uneducated is going to grow wider as society becomes less dependent upon manual labor and more dependent upon technical skill.

But why are so many of these kids failing? Are their schools terrible? Are their families and neighborhoods dysfunctional and chaotic? Are they unmotivated and uneducable? Or is it some combination of these? Whatever the case, when Democrats complain about income inequality they should be asked why their party, which runs every one of our major cities, and has controlled them for fifty years, hasn't been able to fix the problem, and why we should think that re-electing them would make things any better.