As anyone who has spent much time on most college campuses during the last couple of years can attest, the term "social justice" has achieved an almost iconic status. It's a term that glides easily from the lips of many young college progressives, but it's a term which often defies attempts by those who invoke it to explain.
In that respect it's much like "systemic racism" or just plain "racism". The terms are easy to wield as rhetorical weapons, but they're not so easy to define.
So what exactly is social justice? Jonah Goldberg, the author of two excellent books, Liberal Fascism and Suicide of the West, offers a succinct explanation in a brief video at Prager U. which you can watch here:
Simply put, social justice is at best an empty progressive shibboleth and at worst a code word for a recrudescent communism which is too embarrassed by its manifold failures to go by its real name.
Indeed, at least one of the founders of the social justice organization Black Lives Matter, Patrisse Cullors, has acknowledged that she and her fellow organizers are communists steeped in Marxist-Leninist ideology.
What's sought by these people is not "justice" at all but rather its opposite. There's no justice in taking what one person has worked hard his whole life to attain and giving it over to another who may not be willing to work at all, but that's the logic behind social justice nostrums such as racial reparations.
To paraphrase Winston Churchill, the Christian says "All that's mine is yours." The socialist says "All that's yours is mine."
One wonders how many of the more academically successful of those students who are demanding "social justice" would think justice had been served if points were subtracted from their grades and awarded to students who didn't do as well so that everyone got a C.
